Unrated; 83 min.
It is possible to admire Jeremy Scahill and sympathize with his point of view and yet not love Dirty Wars, the documentary based on his recent investigative work into the covert war on terror. The film has its use, for sure, exposing Americas policy of using targeted assassinations and drone strikes. This is a policy that is morally dubious to begin with and one that, according to Scahill, has been employed to an extent and on a scale that most Americans would find shocking.
How can you not respect a guy whos so driven to do such dangerous and unpleasant work? Early in the film, we see him interviewing an impoverished Afghan family, in which several people including two pregnant women were killed in some misbegotten covert night raid. The switch from Presidents Bush to Obama hasnt ended this kind of thing; in fact, it seems to have accelerated under the latter. Scahills point is that such actions are not only cataclysmically wrong but counterproductive. Wiping out innocent civilians is a sure way to create terrorists, not eliminate them.
So long as the camera is on the victims and stays focused on specific crimes and occurrences, Dirty Wars is on solid ground. But as the movie wears on, the story widens, and as it does, it becomes nebulous. Moreover, the focus becomes Scahill himself, who narrates the film and appears on camera looking stoic and concerned, like a virtuous animal in a fairy tale. The movie begins to feel like a star turn, like grandstanding.
The essential problem is that the audience really doesnt care about how Scahill gets the story, or how he feels, or even particularly how he looks. The audience only cares about what the story is, the details. More details and fewer close-ups might have made for a more effective documentary.
Exclusive: Angelika Dallas
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle