Home  >  Movies & TV  >  Movies & TV Reviews

Screen Shots

Taking aim at the best and worst of movies and television.

Movie review: 'The Great Gatsby'

The Great Gatsby


Director: Baz Luhrmann

Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio, Carey Mulligan, Tobey Maguire

Rated: PG-13 (violent images, smoking, partying, sexual content, brief strong language)

Running time: 143 min.


Posted 8:02am on Thursday, May. 09, 2013

Maybe the next time Australian director Baz Luhrmann wants to turn a classic American novel into his brand of big-screen eye candy, he should try Moby-Dick. That’s because all of his effort to get The Great Gatsby on film — at the cost of a reported $127 million — echoes the theme of that whale story: a man obsessed with using all of the artistic harpoons in his arsenal to land the big one and coming up, if not empty, then short of the mark.

Yet Luhrmann’s highly stylized Gatsby — Hollywood’s fifth attempt to turn F. Scott Fitzgerald’s perennial high-school homework assignment into a theatrical film or telemovie — is always visually resplendent. For Luhrmann, style is substance, as he proved to great effect in his 1996 update of Romeo and Juliet. It’s just too bad that this Gatsby, unlike his fling with Shakespeare, is so emotionally inert that there’s little beneath the gleaming surface.

By now, everyone knows the story: It’s the roaring ’20s and young, impressionable Nick Carraway (Tobey Maguire) moves to Long Island to find himself the neighbor of a reclusive millionaire: Jay Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio).

The only thing most people know about Gatsby is that he throws lavish parties, and it’s at one of these that Carraway makes the big man’s acquaintance and becomes embroiled in his life — which isn’t quite as grand as the all the fireworks, champagne, shiny roadsters and jazz (here rendered with a hip-hop swing) make it out to be.

Gatsby is hopelessly in love with his neighbor across the bay, Daisy (Carey Mulligan), who happens to be Nick’s cousin. Trouble is she’s married to an oafish, old-money snob, Tom (Joel Edgerton). So Nick, who narrates the film as a long flashback, has a front-row seat to the inevitable meltdown.

Luhrmann puts so much emphasis on postmodern pizzazz and distancing artifice — the anachronistic music, the needless use of 3-D — that much of the humanity gets buried, especially in the first half of the film. His casting doesn’t help. DiCaprio, although he tries mightily, doesn’t possess the physical gravitas that someone as charismatic as Gatsby should have. And Maguire simply lacks the range to make Nick believable. The fact that there’s no heat from the romantic flame that’s supposed to be kindled when Gatsby and Daisy are together only underscores the problem.

Edgerton (Animal Kingdom, Zero Dark Thirty) does his best to bring some muscular energy to the role of Tom, and the film improves in the less visually busy second half where Luhrmann gives his actors room to breathe.

Yet if the book can be read as a treatise on America and the shimmering mirage of the American dream, little of that comes through in the film.

Still, there are some wonderfully staged moments: Gatsby’s entrance to fireworks and Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue near the beginning, his plunge into a pool near the end, and all those Busby Berkeley-meets-P. Diddy parties in between.

The perfectionist Luhrmann — who has only made five feature-length films in 21 years — captures the exterior excesses of Gatsby’s life but overlooks the interior torment that fuels them. Without the latter, Gatsby is less a film and more of a salute to production design.

We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Our policy requires those wishing to post here to use their real identity.

Our commenting policy | Facebook commenting FAQ | Why Facebook?


Hey there. or join DFW.com. Your account. Log out.

Remember me